Vaclav Sladek vs Arthur Prystenski
CAN/C771/S (CAN), 2020 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vaclav Sladek vs Arthur Prystenski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vaclav Sladek (1917)
- Black
- Arthur Prystenski (2070)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- CAN/C771/S (CAN)
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vaclav Sladek (1917) and Arthur Prystenski (2070) was played at CAN/C771/S (CAN) in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vaclav Sladek games or Arthur Prystenski games? This Vaclav Sladek vs Arthur Prystenski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vaclav Sladek vs Arthur Prystenski?
Vaclav Sladek vs Arthur Prystenski (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vaclav Sladek vs Arthur Prystenski?
The game opened with the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (ECO C12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vaclav Sladek vs Arthur Prystenski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.