Inge Sandstad Skrondal vs Henrik Sjol
2016 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Inge Sandstad Skrondal vs Henrik Sjol with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Inge Sandstad Skrondal (2302)
- Black
- Henrik Sjol (1879)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Inge Sandstad Skrondal (2302) and Henrik Sjol (1879) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Inge Sandstad Skrondal games or Henrik Sjol games? This Inge Sandstad Skrondal vs Henrik Sjol encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Inge Sandstad Skrondal vs Henrik Sjol?
Inge Sandstad Skrondal vs Henrik Sjol (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Inge Sandstad Skrondal.
What opening was played in Inge Sandstad Skrondal vs Henrik Sjol?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (ECO D27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Inge Sandstad Skrondal vs Henrik Sjol, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.