Spyridon Skembris vs Stephan Tschann
2010 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Spyridon Skembris vs Stephan Tschann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Spyridon Skembris (2475)
- Black
- Stephan Tschann (2214)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Spyridon Skembris (2475) and Stephan Tschann (2214) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Spyridon Skembris games or Stephan Tschann games? This Spyridon Skembris vs Stephan Tschann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Spyridon Skembris vs Stephan Tschann?
Spyridon Skembris vs Stephan Tschann (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Spyridon Skembris vs Stephan Tschann?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Spyridon Skembris vs Stephan Tschann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.