James B Skeels vs Loving Akwei
NAPZ/NAIC/10, 2005 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay James B Skeels vs Loving Akwei with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- James B Skeels (2413)
- Black
- Loving Akwei (2333)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- NAPZ/NAIC/10
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17)
About this chess game
This chess game between James B Skeels (2413) and Loving Akwei (2333) was played at NAPZ/NAIC/10 in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more James B Skeels games or Loving Akwei games? This James B Skeels vs Loving Akwei encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won James B Skeels vs Loving Akwei?
James B Skeels vs Loving Akwei (2005) finished 1–0, a win for James B Skeels.
What opening was played in James B Skeels vs Loving Akwei?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (ECO A17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of James B Skeels vs Loving Akwei, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.