Pontus Sjodahl vs Hakan 1967 Svensson
Hasselbacken Open 2019, 2019 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pontus Sjodahl vs Hakan 1967 Svensson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pontus Sjodahl (2440)
- Black
- Hakan 1967 Svensson (2062)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Hasselbacken Open 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pontus Sjodahl (2440) and Hakan 1967 Svensson (2062) was played at Hasselbacken Open 2019 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pontus Sjodahl games or Hakan 1967 Svensson games? This Pontus Sjodahl vs Hakan 1967 Svensson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pontus Sjodahl vs Hakan 1967 Svensson?
Pontus Sjodahl vs Hakan 1967 Svensson (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Pontus Sjodahl.
What opening was played in Pontus Sjodahl vs Hakan 1967 Svensson?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (ECO D35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pontus Sjodahl vs Hakan 1967 Svensson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.