Aleksey S. Sitnikov vs Timur Fakhrutdinov
Lozovatsky Memorial 2018, 2018 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksey S. Sitnikov vs Timur Fakhrutdinov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksey S. Sitnikov (2451)
- Black
- Timur Fakhrutdinov (2417)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Lozovatsky Memorial 2018
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksey S. Sitnikov (2451) and Timur Fakhrutdinov (2417) was played at Lozovatsky Memorial 2018 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksey S. Sitnikov games or Timur Fakhrutdinov games? This Aleksey S. Sitnikov vs Timur Fakhrutdinov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksey S. Sitnikov vs Timur Fakhrutdinov?
Aleksey S. Sitnikov vs Timur Fakhrutdinov (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Timur Fakhrutdinov.
What opening was played in Aleksey S. Sitnikov vs Timur Fakhrutdinov?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Classical Variation (ECO C54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksey S. Sitnikov vs Timur Fakhrutdinov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.