Vilka Sipila vs Evgeny Zanan
15. ch-EUR Indiv 2014, 2014 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vilka Sipila vs Evgeny Zanan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vilka Sipila (2457)
- Black
- Evgeny Zanan (2236)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 15. ch-EUR Indiv 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vilka Sipila (2457) and Evgeny Zanan (2236) was played at 15. ch-EUR Indiv 2014 in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vilka Sipila games or Evgeny Zanan games? This Vilka Sipila vs Evgeny Zanan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vilka Sipila vs Evgeny Zanan?
Vilka Sipila vs Evgeny Zanan (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Vilka Sipila.
What opening was played in Vilka Sipila vs Evgeny Zanan?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vilka Sipila vs Evgeny Zanan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.