Vilka Sipila vs Vaidas Sakalauskas
23. Heart of FIN, 2013 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vilka Sipila vs Vaidas Sakalauskas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vilka Sipila (2423)
- Black
- Vaidas Sakalauskas (2386)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 23. Heart of FIN
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vilka Sipila (2423) and Vaidas Sakalauskas (2386) was played at 23. Heart of FIN in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vilka Sipila games or Vaidas Sakalauskas games? This Vilka Sipila vs Vaidas Sakalauskas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vilka Sipila vs Vaidas Sakalauskas?
Vilka Sipila vs Vaidas Sakalauskas (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Vilka Sipila.
What opening was played in Vilka Sipila vs Vaidas Sakalauskas?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO C13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vilka Sipila vs Vaidas Sakalauskas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.