Vilka Sipila vs Pavel Vladimir Blinkov
2017 · Result 0–1 · Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vilka Sipila vs Pavel Vladimir Blinkov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vilka Sipila (2373)
- Black
- Pavel Vladimir Blinkov (2313)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vilka Sipila (2373) and Pavel Vladimir Blinkov (2313) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vilka Sipila games or Pavel Vladimir Blinkov games? This Vilka Sipila vs Pavel Vladimir Blinkov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vilka Sipila vs Pavel Vladimir Blinkov?
Vilka Sipila vs Pavel Vladimir Blinkov (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Pavel Vladimir Blinkov.
What opening was played in Vilka Sipila vs Pavel Vladimir Blinkov?
The game opened with the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO A12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vilka Sipila vs Pavel Vladimir Blinkov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.