Ladislav Simoncic vs Peter Kvassay
SVK/Cup15/sf3 (SVK), 2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ladislav Simoncic vs Peter Kvassay with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ladislav Simoncic (1752)
- Black
- Peter Kvassay (2051)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- SVK/Cup15/sf3 (SVK)
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ladislav Simoncic (1752) and Peter Kvassay (2051) was played at SVK/Cup15/sf3 (SVK) in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ladislav Simoncic games or Peter Kvassay games? This Ladislav Simoncic vs Peter Kvassay encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ladislav Simoncic vs Peter Kvassay?
Ladislav Simoncic vs Peter Kvassay (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Peter Kvassay.
What opening was played in Ladislav Simoncic vs Peter Kvassay?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (ECO B76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ladislav Simoncic vs Peter Kvassay, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.