Emili Simon Padros vs Fernando Sanz Bastos
2016 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C75).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Emili Simon Padros vs Fernando Sanz Bastos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Emili Simon Padros (2175)
- Black
- Fernando Sanz Bastos (1925)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C75)
About this chess game
This chess game between Emili Simon Padros (2175) and Fernando Sanz Bastos (1925) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C75). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Emili Simon Padros games or Fernando Sanz Bastos games? This Emili Simon Padros vs Fernando Sanz Bastos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Emili Simon Padros vs Fernando Sanz Bastos?
Emili Simon Padros vs Fernando Sanz Bastos (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Emili Simon Padros vs Fernando Sanz Bastos?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (ECO C75).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Emili Simon Padros vs Fernando Sanz Bastos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.