Pavel Simacek vs Peter Michalik
ECo-C TCh-SVK 2022-23, 2023 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pavel Simacek vs Peter Michalik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pavel Simacek (2466)
- Black
- Peter Michalik (2576)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ECo-C TCh-SVK 2022-23
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pavel Simacek (2466) and Peter Michalik (2576) was played at ECo-C TCh-SVK 2022-23 in 2023 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pavel Simacek games or Peter Michalik games? This Pavel Simacek vs Peter Michalik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pavel Simacek vs Peter Michalik?
Pavel Simacek vs Peter Michalik (2023) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Pavel Simacek vs Peter Michalik?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pavel Simacek vs Peter Michalik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.