Pavel Simacek vs Berik Akkozov
16. Olomouc GM Valoz Cup, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pavel Simacek vs Berik Akkozov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pavel Simacek (2467)
- Black
- Berik Akkozov (2391)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 16. Olomouc GM Valoz Cup
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pavel Simacek (2467) and Berik Akkozov (2391) was played at 16. Olomouc GM Valoz Cup in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pavel Simacek games or Berik Akkozov games? This Pavel Simacek vs Berik Akkozov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pavel Simacek vs Berik Akkozov?
Pavel Simacek vs Berik Akkozov (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Pavel Simacek.
What opening was played in Pavel Simacek vs Berik Akkozov?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pavel Simacek vs Berik Akkozov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.