Francismar Aquino Silva vs Natanael Bezerra Viana
2011 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francismar Aquino Silva vs Natanael Bezerra Viana with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francismar Aquino Silva (1760)
- Black
- Natanael Bezerra Viana (1970)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francismar Aquino Silva (1760) and Natanael Bezerra Viana (1970) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francismar Aquino Silva games or Natanael Bezerra Viana games? This Francismar Aquino Silva vs Natanael Bezerra Viana encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francismar Aquino Silva vs Natanael Bezerra Viana?
Francismar Aquino Silva vs Natanael Bezerra Viana (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Natanael Bezerra Viana.
What opening was played in Francismar Aquino Silva vs Natanael Bezerra Viana?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francismar Aquino Silva vs Natanael Bezerra Viana, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.