Emmanuel Andres Silva vs Santiago Ospina Castro
2019 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Emmanuel Andres Silva vs Santiago Ospina Castro with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Emmanuel Andres Silva (2119)
- Black
- Santiago Ospina Castro (1968)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Emmanuel Andres Silva (2119) and Santiago Ospina Castro (1968) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Emmanuel Andres Silva games or Santiago Ospina Castro games? This Emmanuel Andres Silva vs Santiago Ospina Castro encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Emmanuel Andres Silva vs Santiago Ospina Castro?
Emmanuel Andres Silva vs Santiago Ospina Castro (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Santiago Ospina Castro.
What opening was played in Emmanuel Andres Silva vs Santiago Ospina Castro?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Emmanuel Andres Silva vs Santiago Ospina Castro, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.