Richard Santana Silva vs Lucas De Souza Mileski
2019 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Richard Santana Silva vs Lucas De Souza Mileski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Richard Santana Silva (1459)
- Black
- Lucas De Souza Mileski (1809)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Richard Santana Silva (1459) and Lucas De Souza Mileski (1809) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Richard Santana Silva games or Lucas De Souza Mileski games? This Richard Santana Silva vs Lucas De Souza Mileski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Richard Santana Silva vs Lucas De Souza Mileski?
Richard Santana Silva vs Lucas De Souza Mileski (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Lucas De Souza Mileski.
What opening was played in Richard Santana Silva vs Lucas De Souza Mileski?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (ECO A30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Richard Santana Silva vs Lucas De Souza Mileski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.