Bruno Fagner Silva vs Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle
2017 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian (E10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bruno Fagner Silva vs Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bruno Fagner Silva (1481)
- Black
- Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle (1907)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian (E10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bruno Fagner Silva (1481) and Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle (1907) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian (E10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bruno Fagner Silva games or Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle games? This Bruno Fagner Silva vs Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bruno Fagner Silva vs Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle?
Bruno Fagner Silva vs Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle.
What opening was played in Bruno Fagner Silva vs Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian (ECO E10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bruno Fagner Silva vs Reinaldo Resende Fontenelle, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.