Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva vs Paulo Carmo
2. Leca Chess Open 2023, 2023 · Result 1–0 · Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (C24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva vs Paulo Carmo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva (1848)
- Black
- Paulo Carmo (1304)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 2. Leca Chess Open 2023
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (C24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva (1848) and Paulo Carmo (1304) was played at 2. Leca Chess Open 2023 in 2023 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (C24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva games or Paulo Carmo games? This Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva vs Paulo Carmo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva vs Paulo Carmo?
Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva vs Paulo Carmo (2023) finished 1–0, a win for Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva.
What opening was played in Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva vs Paulo Carmo?
The game opened with the Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (ECO C24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ana Ines Teixeira Da Silva vs Paulo Carmo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.