Aleksey V Silkin vs Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz
1. LSS CUP P-00031, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (C43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksey V Silkin vs Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksey V Silkin (2279)
- Black
- Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz (2036)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 1. LSS CUP P-00031
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (C43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksey V Silkin (2279) and Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz (2036) was played at 1. LSS CUP P-00031 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (C43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksey V Silkin games or Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz games? This Aleksey V Silkin vs Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksey V Silkin vs Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz?
Aleksey V Silkin vs Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Aleksey V Silkin.
What opening was played in Aleksey V Silkin vs Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (ECO C43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksey V Silkin vs Lucian-Valentin Iacobitz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.