Arvydas Sileika vs Jakub Lech Pajak
XV AEAC/P 28 (ESP), 2016 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Arvydas Sileika vs Jakub Lech Pajak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Arvydas Sileika (1722)
- Black
- Jakub Lech Pajak (2256)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- XV AEAC/P 28 (ESP)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Arvydas Sileika (1722) and Jakub Lech Pajak (2256) was played at XV AEAC/P 28 (ESP) in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Arvydas Sileika games or Jakub Lech Pajak games? This Arvydas Sileika vs Jakub Lech Pajak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Arvydas Sileika vs Jakub Lech Pajak?
Arvydas Sileika vs Jakub Lech Pajak (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Jakub Lech Pajak.
What opening was played in Arvydas Sileika vs Jakub Lech Pajak?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Arvydas Sileika vs Jakub Lech Pajak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.