Sofia Sigal-Passeck vs Hannes Stefansson
16. ch-EUR Indiv 2015, 2015 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense (A15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sofia Sigal-Passeck vs Hannes Stefansson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sofia Sigal-Passeck (1962)
- Black
- Hannes Stefansson (2573)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 16. ch-EUR Indiv 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense (A15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sofia Sigal-Passeck (1962) and Hannes Stefansson (2573) was played at 16. ch-EUR Indiv 2015 in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense (A15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sofia Sigal-Passeck games or Hannes Stefansson games? This Sofia Sigal-Passeck vs Hannes Stefansson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sofia Sigal-Passeck vs Hannes Stefansson?
Sofia Sigal-Passeck vs Hannes Stefansson (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Hannes Stefansson.
What opening was played in Sofia Sigal-Passeck vs Hannes Stefansson?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense (ECO A15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sofia Sigal-Passeck vs Hannes Stefansson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.