Tuomo Sievilainen vs Jouko Lahti
Kuopio Kalakukko, 1990 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tuomo Sievilainen vs Jouko Lahti with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tuomo Sievilainen (2054)
- Black
- Jouko Lahti (2009)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Kuopio Kalakukko
- Year
- 1990
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tuomo Sievilainen (2054) and Jouko Lahti (2009) was played at Kuopio Kalakukko in 1990 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tuomo Sievilainen games or Jouko Lahti games? This Tuomo Sievilainen vs Jouko Lahti encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tuomo Sievilainen vs Jouko Lahti?
Tuomo Sievilainen vs Jouko Lahti (1990) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Tuomo Sievilainen vs Jouko Lahti?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (ECO A39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tuomo Sievilainen vs Jouko Lahti, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.