S. Sieswerda vs Aart Kogeler
Corr, 1989 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation (E54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay S. Sieswerda vs Aart Kogeler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- S. Sieswerda
- Black
- Aart Kogeler (1768)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr
- Year
- 1989
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation (E54)
About this chess game
This chess game between S. Sieswerda and Aart Kogeler (1768) was played at Corr in 1989 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation (E54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more S. Sieswerda games or Aart Kogeler games? This S. Sieswerda vs Aart Kogeler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won S. Sieswerda vs Aart Kogeler?
S. Sieswerda vs Aart Kogeler (1989) finished 1–0, a win for S. Sieswerda.
What opening was played in S. Sieswerda vs Aart Kogeler?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Exchange Variation (ECO E54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of S. Sieswerda vs Aart Kogeler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.