Gustaw Siennicki vs Wojciech Haliniak
Swietokrzyskie Chess Festival 2024 | A Open, 2024 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gustaw Siennicki vs Wojciech Haliniak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gustaw Siennicki (1929)
- Black
- Wojciech Haliniak (1957)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Swietokrzyskie Chess Festival 2024 | A Open
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gustaw Siennicki (1929) and Wojciech Haliniak (1957) was played at Swietokrzyskie Chess Festival 2024 | A Open in 2024 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gustaw Siennicki games or Wojciech Haliniak games? This Gustaw Siennicki vs Wojciech Haliniak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gustaw Siennicki vs Wojciech Haliniak?
Gustaw Siennicki vs Wojciech Haliniak (2024) finished 1–0, a win for Gustaw Siennicki.
What opening was played in Gustaw Siennicki vs Wojciech Haliniak?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (ECO A83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gustaw Siennicki vs Wojciech Haliniak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.