Ross E Siemms vs Wilhelm Tonnemann
Bogatyrchuk Memorial corr9092, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ross E Siemms vs Wilhelm Tonnemann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ross E Siemms
- Black
- Wilhelm Tonnemann
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Bogatyrchuk Memorial corr9092
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ross E Siemms and Wilhelm Tonnemann was played at Bogatyrchuk Memorial corr9092 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ross E Siemms games or Wilhelm Tonnemann games? This Ross E Siemms vs Wilhelm Tonnemann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ross E Siemms vs Wilhelm Tonnemann?
Ross E Siemms vs Wilhelm Tonnemann finished 0–1, a win for Wilhelm Tonnemann.
What opening was played in Ross E Siemms vs Wilhelm Tonnemann?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (ECO B81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ross E Siemms vs Wilhelm Tonnemann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.