Pawel Siekierski vs Rafal Lewandowski
2010 · Result 0–1 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pawel Siekierski vs Rafal Lewandowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pawel Siekierski (2071)
- Black
- Rafal Lewandowski (2164)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pawel Siekierski (2071) and Rafal Lewandowski (2164) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pawel Siekierski games or Rafal Lewandowski games? This Pawel Siekierski vs Rafal Lewandowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pawel Siekierski vs Rafal Lewandowski?
Pawel Siekierski vs Rafal Lewandowski (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Rafal Lewandowski.
What opening was played in Pawel Siekierski vs Rafal Lewandowski?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pawel Siekierski vs Rafal Lewandowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.