Annelen Siegismund vs Annika Polert
2013 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Annelen Siegismund vs Annika Polert with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Annelen Siegismund (2028)
- Black
- Annika Polert (1842)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Annelen Siegismund (2028) and Annika Polert (1842) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Annelen Siegismund games or Annika Polert games? This Annelen Siegismund vs Annika Polert encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Annelen Siegismund vs Annika Polert?
Annelen Siegismund vs Annika Polert (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Annelen Siegismund vs Annika Polert?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Annelen Siegismund vs Annika Polert, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.