Daniel Siedentopf vs Volker Schoenfeld
2008 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Siedentopf vs Volker Schoenfeld with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Siedentopf (2223)
- Black
- Volker Schoenfeld (1973)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Siedentopf (2223) and Volker Schoenfeld (1973) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Siedentopf games or Volker Schoenfeld games? This Daniel Siedentopf vs Volker Schoenfeld encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Siedentopf vs Volker Schoenfeld?
Daniel Siedentopf vs Volker Schoenfeld (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Daniel Siedentopf.
What opening was played in Daniel Siedentopf vs Volker Schoenfeld?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (ECO D86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Siedentopf vs Volker Schoenfeld, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.