Marcin Sieciechowicz vs Wojtek Sochacki
Leba POL, Ch U16 (b), 2008 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcin Sieciechowicz vs Wojtek Sochacki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcin Sieciechowicz (2259)
- Black
- Wojtek Sochacki (2245)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Leba POL, Ch U16 (b)
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcin Sieciechowicz (2259) and Wojtek Sochacki (2245) was played at Leba POL, Ch U16 (b) in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcin Sieciechowicz games or Wojtek Sochacki games? This Marcin Sieciechowicz vs Wojtek Sochacki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcin Sieciechowicz vs Wojtek Sochacki?
Marcin Sieciechowicz vs Wojtek Sochacki (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Marcin Sieciechowicz.
What opening was played in Marcin Sieciechowicz vs Wojtek Sochacki?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (ECO E25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcin Sieciechowicz vs Wojtek Sochacki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.