Malika Sidibe vs Dounia Riller
FRA Ch U18 Girls, date unknown · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Malika Sidibe vs Dounia Riller with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Malika Sidibe (1846)
- Black
- Dounia Riller (1905)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FRA Ch U18 Girls
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Malika Sidibe (1846) and Dounia Riller (1905) was played at FRA Ch U18 Girls and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Malika Sidibe games or Dounia Riller games? This Malika Sidibe vs Dounia Riller encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Malika Sidibe vs Dounia Riller?
Malika Sidibe vs Dounia Riller finished 1–0, a win for Malika Sidibe.
What opening was played in Malika Sidibe vs Dounia Riller?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Malika Sidibe vs Dounia Riller, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.