Aleksandr Sibriaev vs Alexander Teterin
2011 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandr Sibriaev vs Alexander Teterin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandr Sibriaev (2263)
- Black
- Alexander Teterin (1595)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandr Sibriaev (2263) and Alexander Teterin (1595) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandr Sibriaev games or Alexander Teterin games? This Aleksandr Sibriaev vs Alexander Teterin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandr Sibriaev vs Alexander Teterin?
Aleksandr Sibriaev vs Alexander Teterin (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Aleksandr Sibriaev vs Alexander Teterin?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandr Sibriaev vs Alexander Teterin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.