Julien M Shepley vs Charlie P Metcalfe
1. 4NCL Spring Bank Holiday Congress, 2018 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Julien M Shepley vs Charlie P Metcalfe with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Julien M Shepley (1986)
- Black
- Charlie P Metcalfe (1696)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 1. 4NCL Spring Bank Holiday Congress
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Julien M Shepley (1986) and Charlie P Metcalfe (1696) was played at 1. 4NCL Spring Bank Holiday Congress in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Julien M Shepley games or Charlie P Metcalfe games? This Julien M Shepley vs Charlie P Metcalfe encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Paulsen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Julien M Shepley vs Charlie P Metcalfe?
Julien M Shepley vs Charlie P Metcalfe (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Julien M Shepley vs Charlie P Metcalfe?
The game opened with the French Defense: Paulsen Variation (ECO C10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Julien M Shepley vs Charlie P Metcalfe, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.