Yining Shen vs Juan Bordes Ibanez
74. ch-ESP Absoluto, 2009 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Yining Shen vs Juan Bordes Ibanez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Yining Shen (1791)
- Black
- Juan Bordes Ibanez (2046)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 74. ch-ESP Absoluto
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Yining Shen (1791) and Juan Bordes Ibanez (2046) was played at 74. ch-ESP Absoluto in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Yining Shen games or Juan Bordes Ibanez games? This Yining Shen vs Juan Bordes Ibanez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Yining Shen vs Juan Bordes Ibanez?
Yining Shen vs Juan Bordes Ibanez (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Juan Bordes Ibanez.
What opening was played in Yining Shen vs Juan Bordes Ibanez?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (ECO C05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Yining Shen vs Juan Bordes Ibanez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.