Danil Shatko vs Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez
2008 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Danil Shatko vs Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Danil Shatko (1863)
- Black
- Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez (1711)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Danil Shatko (1863) and Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez (1711) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Danil Shatko games or Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez games? This Danil Shatko vs Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Danil Shatko vs Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez?
Danil Shatko vs Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Danil Shatko.
What opening was played in Danil Shatko vs Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Danil Shatko vs Francisco Javier Toba Rodriguez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.