Natalia Shapovalova vs Natalia Gnidash
UKR Ch U20 Girls sf, 2004 · Result ½–½ · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Natalia Shapovalova vs Natalia Gnidash with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Natalia Shapovalova
- Black
- Natalia Gnidash (1850)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- UKR Ch U20 Girls sf
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Natalia Shapovalova and Natalia Gnidash (1850) was played at UKR Ch U20 Girls sf in 2004 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Natalia Shapovalova games or Natalia Gnidash games? This Natalia Shapovalova vs Natalia Gnidash encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Natalia Shapovalova vs Natalia Gnidash?
Natalia Shapovalova vs Natalia Gnidash (2004) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Natalia Shapovalova vs Natalia Gnidash?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Natalia Shapovalova vs Natalia Gnidash, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.