Mykhailo Shakhov vs Lorenzo Lodici
2012 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit, Fianchetto Variation (D09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mykhailo Shakhov vs Lorenzo Lodici with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mykhailo Shakhov (1792)
- Black
- Lorenzo Lodici (1907)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit, Fianchetto Variation (D09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mykhailo Shakhov (1792) and Lorenzo Lodici (1907) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit, Fianchetto Variation (D09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mykhailo Shakhov games or Lorenzo Lodici games? This Mykhailo Shakhov vs Lorenzo Lodici encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mykhailo Shakhov vs Lorenzo Lodici?
Mykhailo Shakhov vs Lorenzo Lodici (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mykhailo Shakhov vs Lorenzo Lodici?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit, Fianchetto Variation (ECO D09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mykhailo Shakhov vs Lorenzo Lodici, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.