Declan Shafi vs Craig Gillies
122. ch-SCO 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Declan Shafi vs Craig Gillies with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Declan Shafi (1908)
- Black
- Craig Gillies (1630)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 122. ch-SCO 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Declan Shafi (1908) and Craig Gillies (1630) was played at 122. ch-SCO 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Declan Shafi games or Craig Gillies games? This Declan Shafi vs Craig Gillies encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Declan Shafi vs Craig Gillies?
Declan Shafi vs Craig Gillies (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Declan Shafi.
What opening was played in Declan Shafi vs Craig Gillies?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (ECO D61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Declan Shafi vs Craig Gillies, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.