Michael Shadarevian vs Salah Al Assaad
Arab ol, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Shadarevian vs Salah Al Assaad with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Shadarevian (2335)
- Black
- Salah Al Assaad
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Arab ol
- Opening
- Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Shadarevian (2335) and Salah Al Assaad was played at Arab ol and finished 1–0. The opening was the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Shadarevian games or Salah Al Assaad games? This Michael Shadarevian vs Salah Al Assaad encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Shadarevian vs Salah Al Assaad?
Michael Shadarevian vs Salah Al Assaad finished 1–0, a win for Michael Shadarevian.
What opening was played in Michael Shadarevian vs Salah Al Assaad?
The game opened with the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO A12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Shadarevian vs Salah Al Assaad, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.