Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky vs Rudolf Cvak
EU/CT2022/ct 1 2, 2022 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense (D46).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky vs Rudolf Cvak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky (2446)
- Black
- Rudolf Cvak (1934)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/CT2022/ct 1 2
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense (D46)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky (2446) and Rudolf Cvak (1934) was played at EU/CT2022/ct 1 2 in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense (D46). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky games or Rudolf Cvak games? This Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky vs Rudolf Cvak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky vs Rudolf Cvak?
Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky vs Rudolf Cvak (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky vs Rudolf Cvak?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense (ECO D46).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mikhail Ivanovich Shablinsky vs Rudolf Cvak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.