Silvia-Raluca Sgircea vs Davide Olivetti
3. Server24 Open, 2016 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66).
Analyze this game
Open Silvia-Raluca Sgircea vs Davide Olivetti on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Silvia-Raluca Sgircea (2263)
- Black
- Davide Olivetti (2063)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 3. Server24 Open
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Silvia-Raluca Sgircea (2263) and Davide Olivetti (2063) was played at 3. Server24 Open in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Silvia-Raluca Sgircea games or Davide Olivetti games? This Silvia-Raluca Sgircea vs Davide Olivetti encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Silvia-Raluca Sgircea vs Davide Olivetti?
Silvia-Raluca Sgircea vs Davide Olivetti (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Silvia-Raluca Sgircea vs Davide Olivetti?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (ECO E66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Silvia-Raluca Sgircea vs Davide Olivetti, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.