Francesco Sgammato vs Davide Fezza
2009 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francesco Sgammato vs Davide Fezza with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francesco Sgammato (1705)
- Black
- Davide Fezza (2086)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francesco Sgammato (1705) and Davide Fezza (2086) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francesco Sgammato games or Davide Fezza games? This Francesco Sgammato vs Davide Fezza encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francesco Sgammato vs Davide Fezza?
Francesco Sgammato vs Davide Fezza (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Davide Fezza.
What opening was played in Francesco Sgammato vs Davide Fezza?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (ECO E97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francesco Sgammato vs Davide Fezza, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.