Vasily Sevostyanov vs Alexander Timoshenkov
2017 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vasily Sevostyanov vs Alexander Timoshenkov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vasily Sevostyanov (2021)
- Black
- Alexander Timoshenkov (2181)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vasily Sevostyanov (2021) and Alexander Timoshenkov (2181) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vasily Sevostyanov games or Alexander Timoshenkov games? This Vasily Sevostyanov vs Alexander Timoshenkov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vasily Sevostyanov vs Alexander Timoshenkov?
Vasily Sevostyanov vs Alexander Timoshenkov (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vasily Sevostyanov vs Alexander Timoshenkov?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vasily Sevostyanov vs Alexander Timoshenkov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.