Esteban Serrano Cantera vs Alex Catarineu Morales
2014 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Esteban Serrano Cantera vs Alex Catarineu Morales with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Esteban Serrano Cantera (1666)
- Black
- Alex Catarineu Morales (1960)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Esteban Serrano Cantera (1666) and Alex Catarineu Morales (1960) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Esteban Serrano Cantera games or Alex Catarineu Morales games? This Esteban Serrano Cantera vs Alex Catarineu Morales encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Esteban Serrano Cantera vs Alex Catarineu Morales?
Esteban Serrano Cantera vs Alex Catarineu Morales (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Esteban Serrano Cantera vs Alex Catarineu Morales?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (ECO B44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Esteban Serrano Cantera vs Alex Catarineu Morales, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.