Claudio Santos Sergio Filho vs Edson Ricardo Bocca
2013 · Result 1–0 · Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claudio Santos Sergio Filho vs Edson Ricardo Bocca with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claudio Santos Sergio Filho (1902)
- Black
- Edson Ricardo Bocca (1565)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claudio Santos Sergio Filho (1902) and Edson Ricardo Bocca (1565) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claudio Santos Sergio Filho games or Edson Ricardo Bocca games? This Claudio Santos Sergio Filho vs Edson Ricardo Bocca encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claudio Santos Sergio Filho vs Edson Ricardo Bocca?
Claudio Santos Sergio Filho vs Edson Ricardo Bocca (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Claudio Santos Sergio Filho.
What opening was played in Claudio Santos Sergio Filho vs Edson Ricardo Bocca?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (ECO C26).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claudio Santos Sergio Filho vs Edson Ricardo Bocca, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.