Sandor Seres vs Ulrich, Dr. Kermer
Pfalz Ch, date unknown · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sandor Seres vs Ulrich, Dr. Kermer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sandor Seres (1178)
- Black
- Ulrich, Dr. Kermer (1924)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Pfalz Ch
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sandor Seres (1178) and Ulrich, Dr. Kermer (1924) was played at Pfalz Ch and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sandor Seres games or Ulrich, Dr. Kermer games? This Sandor Seres vs Ulrich, Dr. Kermer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sandor Seres vs Ulrich, Dr. Kermer?
Sandor Seres vs Ulrich, Dr. Kermer finished 1–0, a win for Sandor Seres.
What opening was played in Sandor Seres vs Ulrich, Dr. Kermer?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sandor Seres vs Ulrich, Dr. Kermer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.