Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso vs Pedro Beltre
2015 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso vs Pedro Beltre with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso (1789)
- Black
- Pedro Beltre (1861)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso (1789) and Pedro Beltre (1861) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso games or Pedro Beltre games? This Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso vs Pedro Beltre encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso vs Pedro Beltre?
Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso vs Pedro Beltre (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Pedro Beltre.
What opening was played in Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso vs Pedro Beltre?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Domingo Antonio Sepulveda Travieso vs Pedro Beltre, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.