Fabrizio Senzacqua vs Martin, Dr. Schelberg
WSTT/5/19/2, 2019 · Result ½–½ · King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense (C36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fabrizio Senzacqua vs Martin, Dr. Schelberg with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fabrizio Senzacqua (1948)
- Black
- Martin, Dr. Schelberg (1663)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WSTT/5/19/2
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense (C36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fabrizio Senzacqua (1948) and Martin, Dr. Schelberg (1663) was played at WSTT/5/19/2 in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense (C36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fabrizio Senzacqua games or Martin, Dr. Schelberg games? This Fabrizio Senzacqua vs Martin, Dr. Schelberg encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fabrizio Senzacqua vs Martin, Dr. Schelberg?
Fabrizio Senzacqua vs Martin, Dr. Schelberg (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Fabrizio Senzacqua vs Martin, Dr. Schelberg?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense (ECO C36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fabrizio Senzacqua vs Martin, Dr. Schelberg, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.