Danielle Sena Moura vs Martinho Figueira Capelo
2014 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Danielle Sena Moura vs Martinho Figueira Capelo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Danielle Sena Moura (1795)
- Black
- Martinho Figueira Capelo (1966)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Danielle Sena Moura (1795) and Martinho Figueira Capelo (1966) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Danielle Sena Moura games or Martinho Figueira Capelo games? This Danielle Sena Moura vs Martinho Figueira Capelo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Danielle Sena Moura vs Martinho Figueira Capelo?
Danielle Sena Moura vs Martinho Figueira Capelo (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Danielle Sena Moura vs Martinho Figueira Capelo?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (ECO E80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Danielle Sena Moura vs Martinho Figueira Capelo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.