Viktor Timofeevich Semenov vs Michael Preussner
WS/M/219, 2009 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense (C63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Viktor Timofeevich Semenov vs Michael Preussner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Viktor Timofeevich Semenov (2243)
- Black
- Michael Preussner (1886)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/M/219
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense (C63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Viktor Timofeevich Semenov (2243) and Michael Preussner (1886) was played at WS/M/219 in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense (C63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Viktor Timofeevich Semenov games or Michael Preussner games? This Viktor Timofeevich Semenov vs Michael Preussner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Viktor Timofeevich Semenov vs Michael Preussner?
Viktor Timofeevich Semenov vs Michael Preussner (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Viktor Timofeevich Semenov.
What opening was played in Viktor Timofeevich Semenov vs Michael Preussner?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense (ECO C63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Viktor Timofeevich Semenov vs Michael Preussner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.