Ian Sellen vs Gavin Marner
2010 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ian Sellen vs Gavin Marner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ian Sellen (1980)
- Black
- Gavin Marner (2019)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ian Sellen (1980) and Gavin Marner (2019) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ian Sellen games or Gavin Marner games? This Ian Sellen vs Gavin Marner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ian Sellen vs Gavin Marner?
Ian Sellen vs Gavin Marner (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Gavin Marner.
What opening was played in Ian Sellen vs Gavin Marner?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ian Sellen vs Gavin Marner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.